ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the advantages and disadvantages of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU ) and total abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of uterine fibroids .Methods 167 patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids were divid‐ed into the HIFU treatment group(n=86) and the hysterectomy group(n=81) .The adverse events were recorded before operation and at postoperative 1 ,3 ,6 months .The questionnaire survey of the uterine fibroid symptoms‐quality of life (UFS‐QOL) was con‐ducted .The health related living quality was evaluated by using the health survey questionnaire‐36(SF‐36) .Results There were no severe adverse events in either group .The significant clinical complications and adverse events in the HIFU group were lower than those in the hysterectomy group .The UFS‐QOL scores in the HIFU group were superior to those in the hysterectomy group ,but the SF‐36 scores at postopertive 3 ,6 months had statistically significant differences between the two groups (P>0 .05) .Conclusion The patients who are unable to tolerate surgery or hope to preserve the uterus and its physiological function are suitable for HI‐FU treatment .
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of contrast-enhanced ultrasound(CEUS) in the real-time monitoring treatment of ultrasound-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU ) for uterine adenomyosis .Methods From January 2013 to September 2013 ,a total of 67 patients who were clinically diagnosticated as uterine adenomyosis were enrolled in this study .49 patients were diffuse type and 18 patients were localized .CEUS was used before ,in ,after ultrasonic treatment to make sure lesions and evaluate the ablation effect .Results 67 patients were 100% perfused before HIFU treatment by CEUS ,the non-perfused volume ratio of 15 patients(22 .4% ) were not enough during treatment ,and more energy were given .During HIFU treatment ,uniform grey scale change was observed in 42 of 67(62 .7% ) patients and massive grey scale change was observed in 25 of 67(37 .3% ) patients .The margin of targets and the non-perfused volume were clearly detected by CEUS .The size of target andymyosis ,the volume ,the non-perfused volume ,and non-perfused volume ratio were(4 .8 ± 1 .5)cm ,(63 .1 ± 57 .2)cm3 ,(59 .1 ± 53 .4 )cm3 ,(76 .4 ± 27 .0)% .The adverse effects occurred in the treatment were not related to CEUS .Conclusion CEUS is an accurate method in assessing the treat-ment effect of HIFU and could be safely used during HIFU treatment for uterine adenomyosis .